Vertical File 01 — LGL · Litigation & Arbitration
File nothingunexamined.
Your briefs, motions, and opinions carry your firm's name and your client's future. Opposia puts every one of them through hostile review — the citations, the chronology, the causation story — before opposing counsel gets the privilege.
Litigation & ArbitrationThe exposure
What goes wrong when no one argues back.
01
A citation that doesn't say what you claimed
One overstated or vacated authority can unravel a brief and your credibility with the bench. Most AI tools invent or over-read authority with total confidence.
02
Contradictions hiding across the record
The expert report disagrees with the deposition. The chronology disagrees with the exhibits. These conflicts are invisible until the other side finds them in cross.
03
The element nobody argued
A limitation period unanalyzed, a jurisdictional question unraised. Gaps don't announce themselves — they get announced by a motion to dismiss.
04
The other side's AI is already looking
Opposing counsel uses machines to find your weaknesses. Showing up with unexamined work is a strategic choice — and not a good one.
The charge sheet
What Opposia attacks in legal.
Every citation re-verified against what the court actually held
Contradictions mapped across pleadings, depositions, and exhibits
Causation and damages theories stress-tested element by element
Unargued gaps surfaced — jurisdiction, limitations, standing
Privilege exposure screened before anything leaves the firm
The opposition's best motion, drafted before they draft it
Powered by Opposia solutions
A sample verdict
Illustrative findings from one review.
A representative excerpt — every engagement returns findings graded, sourced, and attributable to the agent that raised them.
ATK-01 · Contradiction
Expert report ¶8 states notice was given March 3; deposition p.112 fixes it at March 17. Reconcile before filing.
ATK-03 · Authority Verification
¶31 relies on Hartwell v. Brixton — vacated on appeal in 2024. Substitute authority required.
ATK-06 · Gap
No analysis of the limitation period for Claim III. Opposing counsel will raise it first.
Reviewed by 47 agents. 11 findings returned, 3 critical. All resolved before filing.
Also under examination